How an AI-written Book Shows why the Tech 'Terrifies' Creatives - 167

For Christmas I got an intriguing gift from a good friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few simple prompts about me provided by my good friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, ai-db.science and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit repetitive, and really verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repeated hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, mainly in the US, given that pivoting from putting together AI -generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who created it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He intends to broaden his variety, producing various categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's designed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - offering AI -generated items to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we actually mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI -generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for creative functions should be banned, however I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective but let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to obstruct AI designers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have actually chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of development."

A government representative stated: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their material, access to high-quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI strategy, a national information library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be provided to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the functions of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and grandtribunal.org used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it collects training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the many downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for fishtanklive.wiki a portion of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger projects. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts since it's so long-winded.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm uncertain how long I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.